House Bill 447 would set specific criteria that must be met by the claimant when a workers’ comp claim is filed by a remote worker. If passed, all three of the following requirements must be met by the claimant: the injury must arise out of their employment, caused by a special hazard of their employment, and be sustained in the course of an activity performed exclusively to the benefit of the employer. All of these conditions must be met for the claim to be considered compensable. The current law doesn’t truly differentiate between injuries sustained at the employer worksite from injuries sustained while working from home, which isn’t effective considering 30% of Ohio’s workforce is now remote.
If passed by Ohio’s Senate, the bill will help prevent frivolous claims from remote employees, like this Florida claims adjuster who tripped over her dog while reaching for coffee.
This bill seems to be interpreted differently depending on which side of the fence you’re on. Labor relations advocates feel it will prevent employees from filing a claim if they’ve suffered a work-related injury as a remote worker. You have to read HB 447 in its entirety to see that’s simply not the case. This will still allow for valid, genuinely work-related claims to be filed and compensated – provided the same criteria are met as would be required for an employer worksite injury. Most importantly, this bill spells out what will not be considered an injury when working remotely, which employers have been requesting for years. Being on the clock shouldn’t be mutually exclusive with compensability for a workers’ comp claim. If the language in this bill feels familiar, that’s because it’s very similar to the “coming and going” rules created by judicial precedent. While HB 447 will be a boon for employers in terms of not getting stuck with claims costs on remote worker injuries, there will still be gray areas. That’s where your TPA should shine, and educate you on the applicability of these laws to your specific claims. This bill has passed the House, and will soon move to Ohio’s Senate, and we’ll be sure to keep you updated on its status. You can always reach out to your team at Spooner and Surety at 440-249-5203.
Posted By Brandy King
January 15, 2025
Category: General
The clock is ticking on Group Retro enrollment for the 2025 Ohio BWC policy year! The deadline for Group Retro paperwork is January 27, 2025. If you're a Spooner client enrolling in Retro, you should have already received your program renewal from us. If you haven’t, please reach out to your client services manager. If your BWC policy was disqualified for savings programs for 2025 or you don’t have the flexibility of waiting to see savings, we’d also encourage you to explore SuretyHR, our self-insured PEO (professional employer organization). SuretyHR is an alternative to being insured by Ohio BWC for workers’ compensation. By creating a co-employment relationship with other employers, we’re able to place them in our own self-insured workers’ compensation plan. PEO clients also have the added benefit of SuretyHR’s team assisting with safety, HR, FMLA and unemployment claims administration, and quite a bit more. You can request a savings analysis from SuretyHR
Posted By Brandy King
January 07, 2025
Category: Ohio BWC, Group Retro, 20018 Group Retro, 2019 Group Retro, Group Retro Refunds Withheld
The team at Spooner Risk Control Services, Kent Elastomer Products, Inc. and Roetzel & Andress have scored another win in the fight to get businesses the Group Retro refunds they’ve earned. Background: At the end of 2020, we shared Ohio BWC’s decision to withhold Group Retro refunds owed to participating employers for the 2018 and 2019 policy years. This was based on the concept that employers were already returned 100% of premiums for those years via dividends released to Ohio employers in April and October of 2020. However, dividend distribution and Group Retro refunds are governed by different rules, and different portions of the Ohio Revised Code. We appealed this decision in August 2020, kicking off a legal battle with Ohio BWC that will continue into 2025. After the victory for Group Retro participants in February 2023, BWC appealed the magistrate’s ruling, stating five objections. A hearing was held on November 19, 2024 by the 10th District Court of Appeals, and four of the five objections were overruled. For the reasons detailed here, the court again ruled in favor of Ohio businesses granted a limited writ of mandamus (meaning BWC is obligated to pay out Group Retro refunds). Hellbent on not paying these earned program refunds to employers, BWC chose to file yet another appeal on December 30, 2024 arguing their reasoning for withholding the refunds. From here, the matter will be referred to the Supreme Court of
Posted By Brandy King
December 16, 2024
Category: Non Compete, Employment Law, Non Solicitation Agreement, Ohio
FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Blocked, But Gray Area Remains In early 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) introduced and finalized a rule banning the use of non-competes. Employers, Chambers of Commerce and trade organizations rallied against the new rule claiming it was anti-employer, some going as far as calling it “blatantly awful.” As expected, the change was met with litigation and in August of 2024, the ban was struck down by a federal judge in Texas who claimed the FTC overstepped its authority by issuing the rule. A non-compete (or non-competition agreement) is an agreement in which the employee agrees not to engage in conduct or activities that could increase competition for their employer. These types of arrangements are prevalent in finance, healthcare, design, tech and all types of sales or business development roles. They’re meant to protect things like trade secrets, privileged info and client retention. Non-competes aren’t the same as non-solicitation clauses. These agreements err more toward not calling on your former clients in your new role. Here’s an example of differentiating between the two. Non-Compete: “Upon leaving ABC Company, you may not engage in a similar role for another insurance company within a 50-mile radius.” Non-Solicitation: “Upon leaving ABC Company, you may not solicit (contact/call on) clients of ABC Company in your new role with another insurance company.” For now, bo
28605 Ranney Parkway
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Phone: 440-249-5260 ext. 153
Hours: 8AM to 5PM