FMLA has been maligned by HR departments for years, not only because of the amount of work involved – but also the amount of expertise. Do you ever feel like your management team shouldn’t be the ones determining if a claim submitted actually qualifies? Throwing COVID-related leave into the mix didn’t help, either.
Private companies that employ at least 50 workers (within a 75 mile radius), and public employers regardless of size are required to offer FMLA – 12 weeks unpaid leave during a 12 month period. While many question its value, considering the leave is unpaid – it was put in place to protect the jobs of those experiencing one of the following conditions:
• Birth or adoption of a child
• Care of a spouse, child or parent with a serious health condition
• A serious health condition that renders the employee unable to complete their essential duties
• A qualifying emergency related to a spouse, child or parent being on active military duty
Non-compliance not only puts you on the radar of the Department of Labor (which could result in major fines), but could also expose you to private lawsuits from disgruntled employees. We hear a lot of businesses say, “We just let employees take whatever they need.” Most of them don’t realize that not tracking or over-designating absences to FMLA creates different problems.
FMLA can be very time consuming and frustrating – but Surety HR can take it off your plate. The advantage of using our FMLA services it that we cut your HR department’s work down to completing just one piece of paper, plus tracking the usage. We will handle sending out the appropriate paperwork to employees, and our nurse case manager and in-house counsel will work together to handle the rest, including approving or denying claims. If you’re interested in outsourcing your FMLA management, please reach out to Brian Davis at 440-249-5260 | Ext:107 for more info.
Posted By Brandy King
January 07, 2025
Category: Ohio BWC, Group Retro, 20018 Group Retro, 2019 Group Retro, Group Retro Refunds Withheld
The team at Spooner Risk Control Services, Kent Elastomer Products, Inc. and Roetzel & Andress have scored another win in the fight to get businesses the Group Retro refunds they’ve earned. Background: At the end of 2020, we shared Ohio BWC’s decision to withhold Group Retro refunds owed to participating employers for the 2018 and 2019 policy years. This was based on the concept that employers were already returned 100% of premiums for those years via dividends released to Ohio employers in April and October of 2020. However, dividend distribution and Group Retro refunds are governed by different rules, and different portions of the Ohio Revised Code. We appealed this decision in August 2020, kicking off a legal battle with Ohio BWC that will continue into 2025. After the victory for Group Retro participants in February 2023, BWC appealed the magistrate’s ruling, stating five objections. A hearing was held on November 19, 2024 by the 10th District Court of Appeals, and four of the five objections were overruled. For the reasons detailed here, the court again ruled in favor of Ohio businesses granted a limited writ of mandamus (meaning BWC is obligated to pay out Group Retro refunds). Hellbent on not paying these earned program refunds to employers, BWC chose to file yet another appeal on December 30, 2024 arguing their reasoning for withholding the refunds. From here, the matter will be referred to the Supreme Court of
Posted By Brandy King
December 16, 2024
Category: Non Compete, Employment Law, Non Solicitation Agreement, Ohio
FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Blocked, But Gray Area Remains In early 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) introduced and finalized a rule banning the use of non-competes. Employers, Chambers of Commerce and trade organizations rallied against the new rule claiming it was anti-employer, some going as far as calling it “blatantly awful.” As expected, the change was met with litigation and in August of 2024, the ban was struck down by a federal judge in Texas who claimed the FTC overstepped its authority by issuing the rule. A non-compete (or non-competition agreement) is an agreement in which the employee agrees not to engage in conduct or activities that could increase competition for their employer. These types of arrangements are prevalent in finance, healthcare, design, tech and all types of sales or business development roles. They’re meant to protect things like trade secrets, privileged info and client retention. Non-competes aren’t the same as non-solicitation clauses. These agreements err more toward not calling on your former clients in your new role. Here’s an example of differentiating between the two. Non-Compete: “Upon leaving ABC Company, you may not engage in a similar role for another insurance company within a 50-mile radius.” Non-Solicitation: “Upon leaving ABC Company, you may not solicit (contact/call on) clients of ABC Company in your new role with another insurance company.” For now, bo
Posted By Brandy King
December 16, 2024
Category: Contribution Limits, Employee Benefits, Retirement Plans, HSA, FSA, ACA
ACA Updates & Reminders It’s almost time for ACA reporting! There aren’t any major changes this year, but here are some items to be aware of for the 2024 tax year. The employee distribution deadline for the 1095-C forms is March 3, 2025. Since the 2023 tax year, the IRS requires all employers with more than ten (10) forms to report electronically. Employers can complete this either directly through the IRS website or through a third-party provider. Corrected forms are also required to be submitted electronically. If you’re submitting 10 or fewer forms, you can still file on paper. The deadline for this is February 28, 2025. The deadline for e-filing 1095-C and 1094-C forms to the IRS is March 31, 2025. Keep in mind that there could be additional ACA state reporting requirements for your organization with differing deadlines. The states to pay special attention to are California, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia. Updated penalties and affordability percentages. The ACA penalizes Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) that don’t offer what’s considered affordable coverage to full-time employees (FTEs). The affordability percentage is the maximum amount of an employee’s pay that “Employee Only” coverage can cost the employee in order to be considered affordable by ACA. For 2024, that percentage is 8.39%. The affordability percentage will jump to 9.02% for 2025, and the associated fines will
28605 Ranney Parkway
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Phone: 440-249-5260 ext. 153
Hours: 8AM to 5PM